|
CCTV Technology News & Society
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
|
I recently purchased a simple wired cctv surveillance camera. Installing it was no problem. I needed 30 meters of wire from my front door to my tv set. In between i had to add some wire so i therefore soldered some lengths. The camera works well. Even the sound.
BUT i am constantly getting these two fuzzy lines on the screen which keep on going up and down the screen. They are very annoying. Is it maybe due to the fact that the wire is 30 meters long? The camera does actually work well because when i directly connected it to my tv it was 100% clear!. Or maybe is it the type of wire i used for it? (i used phone wire as it has 4 wires. I used 2 for video and 2 for audio). I am really frustrated. Can anyone try and help please? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 203
|
Yes you have used a twisted pair, but im not suretelephone cable ill be good enough, the problem you are getting with lines is an earth loop, its difficult to know what to recommend, but you will need to earth the video
__________________
"Special Offer"- Digital Video Recorder - 4 X 15M I.R Anti Vandal Dome Camera's - Tv Linked - Fully Installed - £849.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
|
Would be best: use coaxial cable for Video (e.g. RG59) for audio also, recommendation, use shielded cable: all problems with interference will disappear.
__________________
www.Neo-Surveillance.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
|
so will i have to use 2 cables? isnt there a cable where i can put the sound and video in one cable only? p.s there is no problem with the sound. its just 2 lines going up and down the screen. Is it maybe because the wire is too long? (30 meters)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
|
At worst you can use just shielded cable, e.g. Order Code: XS94C from Maplin. Just need to watch: usually thicker cable is better and have better shielding.
This is mine opinion: some at all time using CAT5 cable with passive adapters; but picture quality not meeting my requirements.
__________________
www.Neo-Surveillance.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 30
|
I'd suggest Cat5 cable, which is a 4 pair cable, with a passive balun at either end of the video pair (these are devices that change the impedance of the cable, if you dont use these the video can suffer from double images). Then you can use another pair for audio, and the final 2 pairs for power +-.
Video will transmit hundreds of metres up cat5 without loss using this method. Although you'd suffer from power loss on the cable before then (but 30 metres would be more than fine).
__________________
Visit http://www.orponline.co.uk/ for great deals and friendly advice. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 78
|
I understand what he is saying,
Could i ask what kind of TV your useing as this will affect it big time. Cable is eathir they not enough copper in it or somewhere along line cables anit working. and Guys you can join 50 pieces cable up and it should not make an difference only difference will be less quality, as I use 5meter cable and then 80meter cable for an event up Scotland for CCTV and I used in pass five or six different sort cables and found no problems. Also depends how it been stored. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
|
Each thing is made to do something specific. CAT5 primary made not to use for CCTV. Each cable has technical specification and CAT5 lose to coaxial cable.
Regarding power through CAT5. For these days is popular “all in one cameras” with IR Led; in darkness camera can take 1A (most cameras of this type use 12V DC). For CAT5 used AWG24 wire, so on 50m you can lose >2.5V!
__________________
www.Neo-Surveillance.com |
|
|
|